My Words
Wordle is a cool website that will generate a pretty tag cloud image from a block of text. You can also enter a username from del.icio.us and it will generate a tag cloud based on bookmark tags for that user. You can also change the colors, font, or number of tags used for the cloud. For my del.icio.us bookmarks here’s what I got:
Looks like I’m a tech-savvy web designer who has a good sense of humor and has lived in the Twin Cities and San Francisco.
Italy Pictures
I’ve been back from Italy for a week now, and I finally have finished going through all the photos I took. Once again I took way too many - over 240 this time. I guess when I was there I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing anything that I’d want a picture of later. I’ve pared this down somewhat to what I put on Flickr. My camera started taking slightly fuzzy pictures about half way through the time. Not too bad but I had to do some manual adjustments to some of the photos. I think the lens probably just got smeared or something. Anyway, check out all my pictures from the Florence, the CHI conference, Lucca and Pisa, or watch the slideshow of my favorites below.
Italy, Here I Come
I’m off to Florence, Italy tomorrow for the ACM’s CHI conference. CHI (pronounced like the greek letter) is a conference on computer-human interaction. It’s fairly academic in nature, but is attended by both researchers and professions in computer science, design and psychology. I’m looking forward to networking, hanging out with this year’s CMU HCI master’s students, and of course seeing Florence!
I’ll try to post more from Italy! Back to packing a few final items…
Business Value of Design
I caught this recent panel discussion from Mix08 on the topic of Design and how it contributes and relates to business value. The discussion overall was pretty broad and non-specific, but I thought there were a few interesting points. The viewpoints were especially interesting to me, given that I had recently attended Alan Cooper’s presentation in which he questioned the meaningfulness of measuring traditional business value in the post-industrial economy.
Since I was listening while multitasking, I found it a little difficult to follow who made various points in the audiocast. Therefore I’ll just share some thoughts in general and note individuals only where I’m fairly certain about who made a statement.
When (not) to do user research
Someone on the panel made a comment that caught my attention: know when not to do user research. The statement was that at some times it is a waste to do user research. If a user research presentation ends up on someone’s desk and that person doesn’t appreciate it, then you shouldn’t waste your time doing the research. Perhaps I’m misinterpreting what I heard, but I couldn’t disagree more.
If user research results are ending up on decision-makers desks as a presentation hardcopy, then that is the problem not the user research. User research is most valuable when decision makers are involved in the user research. They don’t have to do it first-hand, but should be exposed to the results in the form of a direct observation or a rich presentation. I’ve seen successful presentations include videos from usability sessions, pictures from site visits, and excerpts from directed storytelling interviews.
I’m not saying the user research is always appropriate and should be done regardless of business culture. However, if the culture isn’t congruent with doing user research, don’t simply cut down and do less of it. The design will suffer in the end.
Methods should be only a means to an end
I think it is David Watson who made an interesting comparison about how designers too often share their design methods with other disciplines and distract from the design itself. He says that spending time explaining the design process, such as how personas, flow diagrams, and wireframes are created is much like a finance analyst telling everyone the details about his various spreadsheets. All anyone cares about is the final design, much like most non-finance workers would only care about how much money is being made. People would care about details such as where the money is coming from but not about how the analyst did the calculations in the spreadsheet.
I think there is a valid point here, and having recently been educated on many design and research methods, I am probably guilty of spending too much time on the process and tools rather than presenting the outcome. However, in many industries I think designers find themselves having to justify their work much more than a finance analyst would. And indeed because the design is so closely tied to key business decisions (i.e. “what are we going to build?”), designers need to justify the end decisions much more than a finance analyst would. Furthermore many teams aren’t as familiar or comfortable with “design magic” and so they need exposure and inclusion when selecting the design methods. I think it comes down to a matter of trust. Until designers demonstrate success within a team the culture may not support design work the same way it does something more core to the business like finance.
The takeaway for me in this analogy is that decisions about the process and tools should be left up to the design team and only shared when necessary to develop trust. And as we all know but not always practice, a design presentation should focus on the final design and only give enough methodology to demonstrate credibility.
Future design trends
Luke Wroblewski from Yahoo! responded to the question “what does the future of design look like?”. He talked about the awful complexity of many of our day-to-day interactions. Electronic devices are constantly asking for our attention with beeps, blinks and vibrations. His vision of future design trends is rooted in a more holistic simple design philosophy.
Hopefully this is a vision that will be realized, however I think this has always been people’s vision of the future. In studying ubiquitous computing at CMU, I read countless papers about how researchers and practitioners envisioned holistic systems which could solve our daily frustrations which never came to be. So, is now the time when design will suddenly allow systems to be more seamlessly integrated and ease our daily bombardment? I’m optimistic, but I see no reason to believe why now is any better of a time than 10 or 20 years ago. Granted, we’ve made some improvements and it’s always easier to see what’s lacking, so perhaps we are making progress. Only time will tell.
First to market vs. Best to market
The last topic that I found very interesting was how market maturity dictates what quality a product must be in order to be successful. The panelists more or less agreed that a less mature market is more forgiving of products with fewer features. This is basically because new products define the market niche for a product. We see a progression of products - take social networks as an example - and as the market matures users demand and expect more features. Competition forces leading products to add features until finally someone redefines the market with a drastic improvement. This phase is often referred to as feature creep and is difficult to avoid once a product becomes popular. The underlying reason is that user needs change - that is, users expect and ask for more and more features. Some of these features are likely to conflict with the needs of others and thus the cycle repeats itself.
What I found interesting about this view is that it directly contradicts the presentation I saw Alan Cooper give last week. His viewpoint is that best to market always beats first to market. I was pretty sold on his ideas at the time I heard him talk, but I think there are many counterexamples in which being first is better than being best. But having this mentality does lead to success - it’s just a different way of thinking about it. In my opinion, Cooper’s definition of “best to market” includes the time at which the product enters the market because down the road the market will be different. It’s enough to pique my interest and want to delve deeper into Cooper’s perspective.
Corte Madera Ride
Finally got out for a nice long bike ride. Sunday was one of the nicest days of the whole year here. High 60s and a little windy but even managed to get a little sunburn.
My friend Jason came up from the south bay and we left mid-morning for a ride. I had done most of the route before, but was excited to show Jason Sausalito and the golden gate close up. It was a very enjoyable day. We rode very leisurely (mostly because I am so out of shape) and stopped along the way to enjoy the scenery. It’s really nice that a large portion of this route from Sausalito to Corte Madera is a separate bike path.
Jason and me before crossing the Golden Gate Bridge. View on Flickr
I was pretty sore Monday and still am a little bit today, but that’s what I get for riding 30 miles without working up to it.
« Older Posts